Alianca de Controle do Tabagisme / HealthBridge Collaboration
Introduction
Drawing on Canadian experience where appropriate, this project sought to increase
public and decision-maker awareness in Brazil on three important issues in tobacco
control:
The use of point-of-sale advertisements and displays to promote tobacco products
by the tobacco industry when other forms of advertising have already been banned;
Workers' right to smoke-free environments under general labour legislation;
Progress towards implementation of the FCTC in Brazil, particularly with respect
to Article 8 (second-hand smoke).
Objectives
The overall goal of this project was to support an enabling environment in Brazil
through which FCTC implementation could be improved.
The objectives of this project were:
To increase public awareness of the prevalence of point-of-sale promotion of tobacco
products, as a prelude to a Canadian-style display ban;
To improve support among decision-makers and the public for workers' rights to clean
air and the applicability of existing labour legislation to the issue of second-hand
smoke in Brazil.
Results and Impact
The project met its two objectives as planned, although there were some modifications
in the activities.
OBJECTIVE 1: TO INCREASE PUBLIC AWARENESS OF THE PREVALENCE OF POINT-OF-SALE PROMOTION
OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS, AS A PRELUDE TO A CANADIAN-STYLE DISPLAY BAN.
Planned and Actual Activities
Public opinion poll addressing POS advertising and displays.This activity was not
undertaken as planned. At the time that the proposal was submitted to Health Canada
in December 2008, a larger public opinion poll was already planned and the questions
on POS were to be added. However, delays in receiving funding approval meant that
the survey went ahead as planned without the POS questions added. That said, though,
the project team was able to draw upon results of a similar survey undertaken in
2008 and informally assessed public opinion in other ways. The project team was thus
able to maintain a high level of interest in the subject in the media (see Appendices),
and thereby continued to keep the issue of point-of-sale tobacco promotion in the
public's mind.
Legal research. This was completed as planned by ACT legal advisor Clarissa Menezes
Homsi (see Appendices). The research report provides details about the issue of point-of-sale
advertising bans from a legal and legislative perspective.
This research report then led to the production of a formal legal opinion that demonstrated
the constitutionality of a total advertising ban on tobacco products. The main arguments
presented in the legal opinion include the following: (i) there are no absolute rights,
thus any right can be limited or even suppressed if there is a reasonable justification;
(ii) such justification should pass through the requirements of the Principle of
Proportionality; (iii) the Brazilian Constitution has already determined that limitation
can be placed on tobacco products advertising; (iv) Brazil has ratified the FCTC
and should approve a bill totally banning tobacco products advertising. ACT sent
the legal opinion to a public prosecutor who in turn used the arguments contained
in it as part of a class action lawsuit against the tobacco industry for its abuse
of existing advertising bans.
Based on the results of the legal opinion, press releases were issued and fact sheets were
produced and widely disseminated. Both were disseminated through ACT's website and
network. ACT and HealthBridge will also include the fact sheets in a kit that will
be disseminated at a seminar about the POS ban planned for March 2nd in Brasilia
at the national Congress. The results of this work has provided a strong basis on
which Brazilian tobacco control advocates can contest tobacco industry arguments
that a total advertising ban is unconstitutional.
ACT has mapped the status of existing bills related to advertising bans on tobacco
products. ACT has contacted the authors of some of those bills directly and good
relationships have been developed. Preparing the research report also made the tobacco
industry's strategy on the issue of tobacco control bills clearer to ACT: the industry
has sought to have these bills attached to an old bill addressing alcohol restrictions;
when that bill was defeated, so would be all of the attached bills on tobacco control.
ACT worked with one of the supportive legislators to exclude the tobacco bills from
the initial vote so that they could be voted on separately.
Results/Key Impact of Objective 1: ACT has laid the groundwork for the development
and passage of a point-of-sale tobacco advertising ban by providing both a legal
and legislative perspective on POS advertising and a legal opinion demonstrating
the ban's constitutionality. This legal opinion has already been used as part of
a class action lawsuit. ACT has identified and begun to mitigate the tobacco industry's
interference in the legislative process. Finally, it increased pubic and government
awareness of the legality and constitutionality of a POS ad ban, and created an informal
alliance with legislators supporting the ban.
OBJECTIVE 2: TO IMPROVE SUPPORT AMONG DECISION-MAKERS AND THE PUBLIC FOR WORKERS'
RIGHTS TO CLEAN AIR AND THE APPLICABILITY OF EXISTING LABOUR LEGISLATION TO THE ISSUE
OF SECOND-HAND SMOKE IN BRAZIL.
Planned and Actual Activities
Report on the legal status of second-hand smoke as an occupational hazard. This was
undertaken as planned by ACT legal advisor Adriana Pereira de Carvalho. To produce
this report, she reviewed Brazilian legislation and jurisprudence, contacted labour
prosecutors and trade unions, and discussed the matter with the Ministry of Labour.
The report highlights the measured harmful effects of second hand smoke on those
working in the hospitality industry and the significant reduction in those harms
that was evident following the implementation of local smoke-free laws. In addition,
the report demonstrates that in spite of the tobacco and hospitality industries'
claims, smoke-free laws implemented at the state and municipal levels have not had
negative economic effects.
Amicus Curiae. In line with the release of the research report on second hand smoke
as an occupational hazard, several Amicus Curiae were filed in favour of municipal
and state smoke-free laws. [Amicus Curiae refers to someone, not a party to a case,
who volunteers to offer information on a point of law or some other aspect of the
case to assist the court in deciding a matter before it. The information may be a
legal opinion in the form of a brief, a testimony that has not been solicited by
any of the parties, or a learned treatise on a matter that bears on the case.]
Seminar. The Seminar "Labor Relationships and Tobacco" took place in Curitiba, capital
of the state of Paraná, in the Public Labour Attorney's head office. Participants
included judges, public labour attorneys, and medical professionals. Among the speakers
were lawyers, judges, tobacco growers, and professionals involved in tobacco control
in Brazil; participants discussed the harmful effects of exposure to tobacco smoke,
particularly for those working in the hospitality industry, and the exploitation
of workers in the tobacco growing sector. The Seminar was a very important step in
the process of involving the public labour prosecutors in the issue of second hand
smoke, as it brought to light the obligation that employers have with respect to
workers' health. Following the Seminar, ACT made contact with other public prosecutors
in order to conduct the same seminar in additional states.
Public opinion poll on second hand smoke. This was not a planned activity. However,
given that the public opinion poll on POS could not proceed as planned, the project
team decided to implement a smaller poll in São Paulo assessing public support for
100% smoke-free environments. The poll results revealed that more than 90% of those
participating approve the new smoke-free law.
Based on the research report and the public opinion results, severalpress releases were
issued and fact sheets produced and disseminated.
Results/Key Impact of Objective 2: ACT has laid the groundwork in addressing smoke-free
environments from an occupational health perspective in Brazil. It has provided evidence
in legal action filed in relation to several smoke-free laws, and has engaged public
labour prosecutors in addressing smoke-free environments as an occupational health
issue.
For more details on these and other results, please see the final project report (appendices
not included).
Lessons Learned
One of the greatest challenges regularly addressed in a project such as this is the
influence of the tobacco industry on legislative debate and decision-making. The
most pertinent lesson learned was the need to identify ways to mitigate the industry's
influence, by taking a different approach, rather than try to fight the influence
directly.
Recommendations
The recommendations generated through this project were largely included within the
legal opinion, which provided the legal basis for regulatory action banning point-of-sale
advertising, and the Smoke-free Environments and Occupational Health in Brazil report,
which formally linked second hand smoke and occupational health rights.